Our colleague at Epstein Becker Green has a post on the Wage & Hour Defense Blog that will be of interest to our readers in the hospitality industry: “Supreme Court Prevents Successive Class Actions from Reviving Time-Barred Claims.”
In most wage and hour cases, each workweek gives rise to a separate claim, at least for statute of limitations purposes. Thus, an employee seeking payment for alleged off-the-clock work or an independent contractor claiming misclassification and entitlement to overtime ordinarily may seek back wages and related recovery only for work performed within a set amount of time—usually two to six years preceding the filing of the complaint, depending on the jurisdiction—preceding the filing of the complaint. ...
Read the full post here.* * * *
If you have questions, please reach out to the author(s).
The Workforce Bulletin blog is currently edited by Scott J. Connolly, Adam S. Forman, Greta Ravitsky, Elizabeth S. Torkelsen, and Jennifer Stefanick Barna.
Tags: American Pipe, China Agritech, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, misclassification, Off the Clock, Paul DeCamp, Rule 23, Statute of Limitations, Utah, Wage and Hour, workweek