Multinational employers now face at least four distinct approaches to regulating AI in the workplace, each with its own definitions, audit requirements, and enforcement triggers.

Despite the differences in form, every framework converges on the same expectation: AI may assist an employment decision, but a human must remain accountable for it.

Frances M. Green and Francesco Rotondi co-authored "The Common Thread in the Tapestry of Global AI Laws: Employee Protection," published in Databird Business Journal, comparing how the United States, the European Union, Italy, and China regulate AI-driven hiring, monitoring, and workforce decisions.

Frances M. Green, Of Counsel at Epstein Becker Green, counsels multinational employers on AI governance, cybersecurity, and data privacy compliance. Francesco Rotondi, Founding Name Partner of LabLaw Studio Legale Rotondi & Partners advises Italian and multinational companies on labor law, industrial relations, and corporate reorganizations.

The Q&A walks through recruitment screening under the EU AI Act and GDPR, and Italy's Legislative Decree No. 152/1997 and Law No. 132/2025. It also covers China's Personal Information Protection Law and the U.S. patchwork of disclosure and audit duties. Those include Illinois's biometric privacy statute, New York City's Local Law 144 bias audits, and the EEOC's position that Title VII reaches AI-driven decisions regardless of new legislation. Frances and Francesco also address a pending California class action against Meta Platforms alleging AI-assisted layoff selection. They also cover Italy's Workers' Statute protections, which require employee-representative agreement or Labour Inspectorate authorization before deploying workplace monitoring tools. Employers are urged to inventory their AI systems, question vendor bias-testing claims, and build documented human review into every AI-assisted decision. As Frances puts it, the goal is to "design 'decision workflows' in which the AI informs, and a human decides."

Epstein Becker Green Staff Attorney Ann W. Parks contributed to the preparation of this article.

Get in Touch

To learn more about this topic, contact Frances Green at fgreen@ebglaw.com.

Jump to Page
Advanced Search ›

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.