For general counsel, privacy officers, and compliance teams deploying AI chatbots, call center software, or transcription tools, a wave of decades-old wiretapping statutes has become an unexpected new source of litigation exposure.

In Eavesdropping by Algorithm: How Courts Are Applying Decades-Old Privacy Laws to AI, published in New York Law Journal, Frances M. Green, Of Counsel at Epstein Becker Green and counsel to companies on cybersecurity, data privacy, and AI governance compliance, and Megan Archibald, Associate at Epstein Becker Green and defense counsel to employers on litigation, compliance, and workplace investigations, trace how the federal Wiretap Act, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, and state analogs such as California's Invasion of Privacy Act are being applied to AI chatbots and transcription tools.

Green and Archibald trace the wave back to Javier v. Assurance IQ, which held that consent given after a website already began collecting data was not valid consent. That principle now reaches AI customer service tools, with courts split: in Taylor v. ConverseNow Technologies, a federal court let wiretapping claims proceed against an AI voice assistant used by a pizza chain, while in Lisota v. Heartland Dental, a different court dismissed similar claims under the Wiretap Act's "ordinary course of business" exception. As Green wrote, "consent obtained after recording begins is no consent at all."

The authors flag AI transcription tools used in health care settings as the next area of exposure, alongside new disclosure laws in California, New York, Washington, Nebraska, and Idaho. They recommend auditing which AI tools run on customer-facing platforms, moving consent ahead of data collection, naming vendors specifically in privacy policies, and confirming vendor contracts limit data use to service delivery.

Get in Touch

To discuss how your organization can assess AI vendor exposure under wiretapping and privacy laws, contact Frances Green at fgreen@ebglaw.com or Megan Archibald at marchibald@ebglaw.com.

Jump to Page
Advanced Search ›

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.