Medicare's new LEAD Model has drawn attention for bringing Advantage-style payment mechanics into traditional fee-for-service accountable care.

Whether those mechanics close the structural gap between the two programs is a harder question.

Kevin Malone, Mark Lutes, and Christine Burke Worthen, Members of the Firm in the Health Care & Life Sciences practice of Epstein Becker Green, co-authored "The LEAD Model and the Remaining Structural Limits to Fee-for-Service Value-Based Care" in Health Affairs.

Drawing on their experience advising both Medicare Advantage plans and ACOs since the inception of the MSSP, the authors examine where LEAD closes structural gaps with MA, and where it does not. LEAD adopts several MA-style features for the first time in fee-for-service ACOs: prospective capitated payments, beneficiary engagement incentives, and downstream specialist risk arrangements. Its 10-year performance period with no re-basing is unprecedented for any ACO initiative. The authors identify where that design advance meaningfully narrows the gap and where structural differences in how provider behavior is influenced, how integrated care infrastructure is sustained, and how rates are set and risk is adjusted remain unresolved.

The mechanisms that give MA plans operational control over integrated care (prospective rates, enrollment-based authority, utilization management, network contracting, real-time data, integrated Part C and D payment) have no full counterpart in the MSSP or LEAD. In some areas LEAD narrows the gaps (stable 10-year benchmarks, Part D buydown, CARA). In others, the gaps remain substantial (retrospective settlement with a 9–15-month lag, request-based claims data, absence of prospective provider-network authority, discretionary fraud-related reopening). Financial responsibility and operational authority have been calibrated differently in MA and in fee-for-service, and LEAD recalibrates the financial side without fully aligning the operational side.

Get in Touch

To learn more about this topic, contact Kevin Malone at kmalone@ebglaw.com, Mark Lutes at mlutes@ebglaw.com, or Christine Burke Worthen at cworthen@ebglaw.com.

Jump to Page
Advanced Search ›

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.