Commercial Litigation Update

            With summer behind us and fall underway, the Supreme Court’s 2026–2027 term is here. Twenty-five cases spanning civil, criminal, and administrative topics will occupy the Justices’ docket; several may capture the nation’s attention. Among the cases to watch are Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, No. 25-498 (Jan. 16, 2026); Younge v. Fulton Judicial Circuit District Attorney’s Office, Georgia, No. 25-352 (Mar. 30, 2026); and Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, No. 25-183 (Dec. 8, 2025).

In the wake of this country’s longest federal shutdown, federal courts were facing unprecedented decision-making whether to stay civil proceedings implicating federal employees and agencies.

The Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits federal agencies from spending beyond their allotted funding and simultaneously restricts federal employees from working on a volunteer basis. The Act provides, in relevant part:

An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government may not accept voluntary services for either government or employ personal services exceeding that authorized by law except for emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property.

31 U.S.C. § 1342 (emphasis added).

During lapses in federal funding, voluntary services are only authorized in very limited circumstances, but the parameters of the “safety of human life” or “protection of property” exceptions have not been uniformly defined nor applied across the courts.