Think you’re being healthy when you reach for that KIND bar in the middle of your workday? We won’t say yes or no—since the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has recently declined to opine on what “all natural” means—or to hear from experts on the matter.
On May 2, the Second Circuit held that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York did not err in throwing out a class action suit against KIND, LLC based on the use of the term “all natural.”[1] The company, of course, markets, advertises, and distributes snack foods including that Caramel Almond & Sea Salt bar that got you through the afternoon.
The district court granted KIND’s motion for summary judgment in September 2022, holding that the plaintiffs (consumers) had failed to establish how a reasonable consumer would understand the term “all natural.”
On July 11, 2019, a Federal judge for the U.S. District Court for Maryland ruled that manufacturers and importers of products such as e-cigarettes and other electronic nicotine delivery systems (“ENDS”) have ten months to submit applications for marketing to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). The ten-month deadline is applicable to new tobacco products on the market as of the August 8, 2016 deeming rule that extended FDA’s regulatory jurisdiction to include all tobacco products. Accordingly, manufacturers of e-cigarettes now have until May 2020 to submit ...
Recent Updates
- CMS Wants to End Certain COVID Requirements, Natural Light in Patient Care Areas: Proposed Rule Would Update CoPs for Hospitals, LTC Facilities, and Other Providers
- The Structural Pressures Behind Senior Living and Long-Term Care Distress
- CMS Proposed Rule to Implement Section 6224 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act
- FDA Finalizes Key Parts of Its NDIN Guidance Related to Identity and Safety Information: What Dietary Supplement Companies Should Know
- The Whistleblower Windfall? DOJ Announces Another Incentive Program for Reporting Fraud