Paul DeCamp Quoted in “New FLSA Opinion Letters Include an About-Face on 80/20 Tip Rule”

Wolters Kluwer's Employment Law Daily Wrap Up—DOL News

Paul DeCamp, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC office, was quoted in Wolters Kluwer's Employment Law Daily Wrap Up—DOL News, in “New FLSA Opinion Letters Include an About-Face on 80/20 Tip Rule,” by Pamela Wolf.

Following is an excerpt (see below to download the full version in PDF format):

The Department of Labor on November 8 released four new opinion letters on FLSA compliance. One of those letters put an end to the controversial so-called 80/20 tip rule governing the employer tip credit when employees perform both tipped and non-tipped job duties. The change will have a huge impact on the restaurant industry and currently ongoing litigation.

80/20 rule rolled back. Opinion Letter FLSA2018-27 reinstates virtually verbatim (the minimum wage amount has changed) a 2009 opinion letter addressing the definition of a “tipped employee” for purposes of the tip credit under which employers may pay tipped employees not less than $2.13 per hour and take a “tip credit” for the difference between paid wages and the federal minimum wage.

There has long been substantial confusion over the application of the tip credit when an employee has dual jobs or related duties that include both tipped and non-tipped work. The DOL has at times relied on guidance that would draw the line where an employee’s non-tipped work exceeds 20 percent of working time—the so-called 80/20 rule.

The November 8, Opinion Letter nixes the 80/20 rule, as a matter of official Wage and Hour Division policy, and as an official ruling for purposes of the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 C.F.R. 259.

Restaurant industry impact. Epstein Becker & Green attorney Paul DeCamp shared his insights on this important development. As he sees it, the DOL has a long history of imposing requirements on restaurants concerning tipped employment that have “no basis at all in the Fair Labor Standards Act.” The DOL’s 80/20 guidance was issued in 1988—one of many examples of the Department exceeding its authority, according to DeCamp. “While perhaps well intentioned, the Department’s regulatory and subregulatory excesses have come under increasing scrutiny in recent years,” he observed.

“What the 80/20 guidance purported to require was for employers to pay tipped employees full minimum wage, rather than the tipped minimum wage, for time spent on so-called side work—tasks like cleaning, preparing the service area, and the like—if the employees spend more than 20 percent of their working time on side work,” DeCamp explained. “Not surprisingly, this guidance led to a huge wave of class actions against restaurant companies across the country.” …

Courts get into the act. Late in 2017, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals originally rejected the 80/20 guidance as contrary to the FLSA, DeCamp pointed out. Subsequently, however, an 11-judge en banc panel of the same appeals court took a different view, upholding the 80/20 guidance by an 8-3 vote.

Following the Ninth Circuit’s en banc ruling, and with the 80/20 guidance still on the books at the DOL, the Restaurant Law Center decided to take action, according to DeCamp. “We filed a lawsuit in federal court in Texas challenging 80/20 as unlawful,” he said. “The government’s response to our complaint is due next week.” …

A few words for employers. DeCamp offered a few suggestions related to the change in guidance. “Employers will still want to exercise caution and common sense when it comes to tipped employees,” he said. “If employees perform side work, it should be in connection with a shift in which the employees are also performing the core duties of their roles. Assigning a server to spend an entire shift, or a significant portion of a shift, in the kitchen washing dishes can still be problematic. But if employers use good judgment and assign side work in a manner consistent with how the industry has assigned side work for decades, the FLSA should no longer present a threat to that practice.”