Mike Kun defends employers in high-stakes wage and hour, breach of contract, discrimination, and harassment cases. He has litigated more than 160 wage and hour class and collective actions in California, New York, Georgia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania. Clients credit Mike’s ability to identify issues early.

He develops creative strategies to dispose of claims and drastically reduce their litigation exposure—and he does it efficiently to help them save money. By focusing on the unique issues in each case, he regularly defeats class certification motions or obtains dismissal of proposed class claims.

Mike’s creative approach is highly effective when defending employers in class and collective actions, as well as in single-plaintiff cases. He’s taken more than a dozen single- or multi-plaintiff cases to trial, defending claims of discrimination, retaliation, harassment, breach of contract, and defamation. He draws on his litigation experience to help his clients avoid costly mistakes in their pay practices, employment agreements, arbitration agreements, and restrictive covenants.

Mike is co-chair of Epstein Becker Green’s Wage and Hour practice group, co-creator of the firm’s Wage & Hour Guide for Employers app, and co-editor of, and a contributing writer to, the firm’s Wage and Hour Defense Blog.

Read more

Outside of his legal practice, Mike has published 10 books. His novel You Poor Monster was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize. His novel The Locklear Letters was adapted for a movie entitled “Eat Wheaties!” that was released in 2021. He also co-authored We Are Still Tornadoes, which was adapted into a play and is being developed for a television series.

Read less

Focus Areas


  • Defeated class certification on claims that a national insurance company was the “joint employer” of its vendors’ property inspectors, did not pay for all time worked, denied them meal and rest periods, and provided inaccurate wage statements. After developing a creative strategy to show the plaintiffs could not establish the elements for class certification, Mike was able to reduce the case to just four plaintiffs and obtain an award of summary judgment as to those four individuals.
  • Defeated class certification of claims brought against an ambulance industry client claiming it did not provide adequate meal and rest breaks to paramedics. Mike convinced the court to strike Private Attorneys General Act representative claims as unmanageable, and then persuaded the court of appeal to dismiss the plaintiff's appeal of those rulings.
  • Defeated class certification of claims for unpaid wages, missed meal and rest periods, and inaccurate wage statements brought against a residential housing industry client. By showing the plaintiff could not establish the elements of class certification, Mike reduced the matter to a single-plaintiff case, which he then convinced plaintiff to dismiss voluntarily.
  • Obtained summary judgment in a class action brought against a temporary staffing company where the plaintiff claimed the temporary staffing company was vicariously liable for alleged wage and hour violations of its client. Mike’s creative arguments were upheld on appeal, establishing a precedent in California that alleged “joint employers” are not liable for each other’s alleged wage and hour violations.
  • Convinced a federal judge to deny the plaintiff’s motion for class certification on claims that a staffing company did not timely pay final wages to more than 1,000 terminated employees in California.


  • Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business, CaliforniaLabor and Employment (2009, 2012, 2013)
  • The Legal 500 United States, Labor and Employment Disputes (Including Collective Actions): Defense (2012, 2013, 2017 to 2023)
  • The National Law Review, "Go-To Thought Leader," Employment Law (2019)
  • Southern California Super Lawyers, Employment & Labor: Employer and Class Action/Mass Torts: Defense (2006 to 2020)



  • University of Virginia School of Law (J.D., 1988)
  • Johns Hopkins University (B.A., with honors, 1984)

Bar Admissions

Court Admissions





Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.