Robert J. O’Hara, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s New York office, authored an article in Legal Pulse, published by the Washington Legal Foundation, titled Smithfield, Safety, and OSHA: Navigating Through Litigation in the COVID-19 Era.”

Following is an excerpt:

On April 23, 2020, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, workers in Milan, Missouri sued the largest pork producer in the United States, Smithfield Foods, Inc. (“Smithfield”), over its failure to provide a safe workplace. Press accounts indicated that hundreds of employees at other Smithfield facilities in South Dakota and Wisconsin became infected with COVID-19, creating “virus hot spots” in those locations, forcing Smithfield to shut down those plants.  Although there were no Milan workers infected by the COVID-19 virus at the time of suit and the plant continued to operate, the Milan workers were understandably concerned that they could also fall victim to the virus.

The suit, Rural Community Workers Alliance vs Smithfield Foods, Inc. (No. 5:20-CV-06063-DGK) brought in the Western District of Missouri, alleged that Smithfield knowingly endangered its workers by failing to follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) guidelines and state public health officials. …

This case pivoted on a few key factors—deference to an expert agency and lack of injury. The court stepped out of OSHA’s way, but left an opening to revisit the claim if warranted.  Since the OSH Act contains no private right of action, litigants in such situations will need to pursue a public-nuisance claim. Such a cause of action is already being tested against employers in other industries in the COVID-19 context.  Employers should monitor those cases closely.

The most important takeaway here is that a thoughtful review and implementation of guidance issued by CDC, OSHA, state agencies etc. may be the best deterrent to the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace and the best defense to the rash of suits on the horizon.  Stay tuned, as the COVID-19 virus has evolved, so too will regulation, law, and litigation.

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.