Nathaniel M. Glasser, Stuart M. Gerson, Paul DeCamp, and Carly Baratt co-authored an article in the Legal Backgrounder, published by the Washington Legal Foundation, titled “Joint Employment Liability: What Administrative Agencies’ Rule Revisions Mean for Employers.”

Following is an excerpt (see below to download the full version in PDF format):

Nearly 60 years ago, the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) promulgated 29 CFR § 791.2, which imposes joint liability under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) where multiple persons are “not completely disassociated” or “acting entirely independently of each other” with respect to an individual’s employment.  Recognizing that the “not-completely-dissociated” standard is unclear and subject to broader application than intended, on January 1, 2020, the DOL issued a final rule to revise and clarify the responsibilities of businesses in potential joint-employment arrangements.  Specifically, the final rule sets forth a new four-factor test for determining joint employment, focusing on whether an entity exercises certain powers to a degree that justifies joint status with a given employer.

The DOL’s efforts to relax the joint-employer standard mirror those of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), which, during the Trump administration, has enacted a rule that reverses the expansive view taken in Browning-Ferris Industries. Not to be left out, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has announced that it will issue proposed amendments to regulations implementing several of the laws under its purview, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act.  Although the EEOC’s position is not entirely clear, it would not be surprising if the EEOC joins the DOL in narrowing the scope of joint employment—a trend that should be welcome news to employers.

Resources

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.