Stuart Gerson, a Member of the Firm in the Litigation and Health Care & Life Sciences Practices in the Washington, DC and New York offices, was interviewed on misconduct by Justice Department prosecutors in the case against former Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska and the Justice Department's issuance of three memos guiding prosecutors in dealing with exculpatory evidence.

Gerson said the memos are a good start.

"They did the right thing," Gerson said. "But it's not enough. There is a working group formed under the aegis of the American Bar Association. It's similar to the one we had with regard to attorney client privilege. That one involved the ACLU, the ABA, the Chamber of Commerce. It was across the board. We are seeing a similar effort with regard to disclosure of exculpatory information. And it even involves judges. There are several federal judges and a number of state judges who are involved in this working group. And it very well could lead to legislation."

In early January, Deputy Attorney General David Ogden issued memo for federal prosecutors setting out standards for handling evidence.

"The pronouncements in these Ogden rules are helpful," said Gerson. "They instruct the prosecutors to disclose exculpatory information in a timely fashion. But they don't go far enough."

Gerson pointed out that the policy differentiates exculpatory evidence from the situation in which a witness contradicts himself and provides impeachment material, where prosecutors are instructed to govern disclosure by the Jencks Act.

"Theoretically, if the witness is not going to be called, the contradictory information may never be disclosed. That is a weakness in the policy and it needs to be addressed," said Gerson.

"The Stevens case is a classic example of showing why contradictions in witness interviews of a material nature are just as exculpatory as other evidence," he added.

"There is more to do. I certainly applaud what the Department has done. It is an attempt to address some of these issues. But it doesn't go far enough."

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.