Stuart M. Gerson, Member of the Firm in the Litigation and Health Care & Life Sciences practices, in the firm’s Washington, DC, and New York offices, was quoted in the Bloomberg BNA Health Care Daily Report, in “Health-Care Fraud’s Hammer: An Organized Crime Law,” by Matt Phifer.

Following is an excerpt:

Racketeering immediately conjures images of the Mafia, John Gotti, and Al Capone, but a law intended to fight organized crime is also being used as a tool in health-care fraud cases.

While many health-care fraud cases revolve around the False Claims Act, the Stark law, and the anti-kickback statute, there is another option for plaintiffs accusing providers of health-care fraud: the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). And it is being used as an alternative to those traditional health-care fraud actions.

The wide interpretation of RICO by courts and the willingness of plaintiffs to use it to accuse health-care providers of fraud mean that providers need to be ready for the very damaging consequences of facing a civil RICO action. …

RICO carries heavy criminal consequences, including penalties up to $25,000 and prison sentences that can last two decades. But RICO also provides an opportunity for people whose business or property was harmed by a RICO violation to file a civil suit under the law and receive treble damages and attorneys’ fees.

Its stigma can be devastating for a health-care provider, such as a hospital.

“Charging somebody with RICO really carries a stigma,” Stuart Gerson, a member of Epstein Becker Green’s health-care and life sciences practice in Washington who is a former acting U.S. attorney general. “It puts them under the shade of ‘The Sopranos,’ the Mafia type.” …

The lawyers who spoke to Bloomberg Law were split on whether civil RICO is a growing trend in health-care cases, but it’s undoubtedly being used. …

But Gerson hesitated to call it a trend. “I think what we’ve seen is a couple cases and it shows no more than some creative attorneys view this as an alternative way to bring a treble damages case,” Gerson said, pointing out that there are still far more FCA cases.

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.