On May 29, 2009, the federal government requested an additional 70 days to review a regulation issued last year by the Bush Administration (the "Final Rule") that would impose an E-Verify requirement on all government contractors. This extension request, made in connection with a lawsuit filed by the US Chamber of Commerce in the U.S. District Court in Maryland to enjoin the Final Rule, is the latest in a series of delays in the implementation of the Final Rule. If granted, the motion would extend the implementation date to September 8, 2009, a delay of 200 days since the Final Rule's initial promulgation.

The Final Rule originally was published on November 14, 2008. See 73 Fed. Reg. 67,651. It represented an amendment to the Federal Acquisition Regulations and outlined the steps necessary to implement Executive Order 13465, issued by President Bush in June 2008. The Executive Order and the Final Rule seek to require all entities entering into contracts with the federal government and specifically with the Department of Defense, General Services Administration and NASA, to verify through E-Verify the identity and employment eligibility of employees tasked with fulfilling the contract.

Immediately following publication of the Final Rule, the US Chamber of Commerce and other groups sued to enjoin enforcement of the Final Rule claiming, among other things, that the Executive Order and Final Rule were unconstitutional because they made a voluntary program mandatory on employers seeking federal contracts, and would impermissibly require employers to use E-Verify on existing employees as well as new hires. When E-Verify was first introduced, it explicitly prohibited employers from utilizing it on existing employees as a way of safeguarding them from unlawful workplace discrimination.

Since the lawsuit was filed, implementation of the Final Rule has been delayed three other times, most recently to June 30, 2009. The struggle over the federal contractor E-Verify provisions are emblematic of the overall struggle the federal government has had with immigration policy in balancing immigration enforcement with immigration benefits and the interests of the business community. While many employers claim that the administrative costs and compliance issues outweigh the benefits gained by utilizing E-Verify, many of those employers have already had to face situations where an E-Verify requirement has been imposed by state legislatures. Since 2006, more than half of the state legislatures have imposed some type of E-Verify requirement on employers doing business in the state. Most notably, since January 1, 2008, all Arizona employers have been required to utilize E-Verify on all newly hired employees or face the revocation of their business licenses. The Arizona law has recently survived challenges in the federal courts claiming that it was unconstitutional. The Arizona law was implemented by then-Governor Janet Napolitano, who is now Secretary of Homeland Security.

A decision on the motion is expected shortly.


Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.