Melissa L. Jampol and Elena M. Quattrone, attorneys in the Health Care & Life Sciences and Litigation practices, in the firm’s New York office, co-authored an article in Law360, titled “Sentencing Guidelines Proposal May Encourage More Trials.” (Read the full version – subscription required.)

Following is an excerpt (see below to download the full version in PDF format):

On Jan. 12, the U.S. Sentencing Commission, in an act that has been lauded by the defense bar and criminal justice reform advocates alike, published proposed amendments to the U.S. sentencing guidelines for the first time in over four years.

Proposed amendments that are of particular interest to the defense bar and criminal justice advocates are those to U.S. sentencing guidelines Section 1B1.3 regarding the use of relevant conduct at a defendant's sentencing, including acquitted conduct, uncharged conduct and conduct contained in charges that were dismissed.

As is typical for any proposed amendment, the commission has requested public comment on its proposal before any final rule is enacted. The notice-and-comment period on the proposed amendments was open until March 14, with May 1 as the deadline for when the commission will send the proposed amendments to Congress for consideration.

Then, Congress has six months to veto the proposed amendments. Accordingly, the proposed amendments could become effective by Nov. 1.

Given the centrality of "relevant" conduct to the entire construct of the sentencing guidelines, the proposed amendments would significantly affect both a defendant who chooses to exercise their Sixth Amendment right to take their case to trial and is found guilty of some, but not all the counts in an indictment, as well as those defendants who decide to plead guilty in conjunction with a plea agreement.

If the proposed amendments go into effect, they very well may influence a defendant's calculation on whether to go to trial in the first place in cases where the government proposes an onerous plea agreement with expansive conduct.

By prohibiting dismissed and acquitted conduct from being considered at sentencing, the proposed changes may provide a defendant in this situation with an opportunity to narrow the potential criminal conduct considered by the court at sentencing, as opposed to conduct that the government may seek to include in a plea offer to expand culpability through the use of relevant conduct.

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.