Antitrust Byte

In their Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care (“Policy Statements”), the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (collectively, “Agencies”) offer useful guidance for various arrangements that take place in the health care industry. The Policy Statements provide “safety zones” that “describe conduct that the Agencies will not challenge under the antitrust laws, absent extraordinary circumstances.”

Often, providers are solicited (by either competing providers or payers) to participate in written surveys related to the price or cost of health care services, such as surveys on reimbursement levels, salaries and wages of personnel, or expenditures for equipment or supplies. Participating in such surveys can raise antitrust concerns. However, Statement 6 of the Policy Statements provides guidance on participating in those surveys and sets out a safety zone for such participation.

In order to operate within the safety zone set out in Statement 6, the following three conditions need to be satisfied:

  1. The survey must be managed by a third party (e.g., a purchaser, a government agency, a health care consultant, an academic institution, or a trade association).
  2. Any information provided by survey participants must be based on data that is more than three months old.
  3. The data must be (a) generated from at least five different providers, none of whom may represent more than 25 percent of any given statistic, and (b) sufficiently aggregated such that recipients of the information cannot identify the prices charged or compensation paid by any individual provider.

Conduct that does not fit squarely within the safety zone set out in Statement 6 is not necessarily illegal but would need to be evaluated to determine whether the conduct “has an anticompetitive effect that outweighs any procompetitive justification for the exchange.” Any exchanges that result in an agreement among competing health care providers to fix prices or costs would likely be deemed “per se illegal” by the Agencies.

* * *

For additional information about the issues discussed above, or if you have any other antitrust concerns, please contact the Epstein Becker Green attorney who regularly handles your legal matters, or one of the authors of this Antitrust Byte:

E. John Steren
Member of the Firm

Patricia Wagner
Member of the Firm,
Chief Privacy Officer


Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.