Epstein Becker Green Health Care and Life Sciences Client AlertOn December 19, 2014, various federal agencies issued proposed regulations (“Proposed Regulations”)[1] to amend the definition of “excepted benefits” to include certain limited wraparound health insurance coverage. “Excepted benefits” are those benefits that are generally exempt from certain of the market-wide health insurance requirements that were created under the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) and codified in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and the Public Health Service Act (“PHSA”). Comments on the Proposed Regulations are due to the agencies no later than January 22, 2015.[2]

By way of background, there are four categories of excepted benefits:

  1. benefits that are not generally health coverage, such as auto insurance and workers compensation;
  2. limited scope benefits, such as limited vision or dental benefits, and benefits for long-term care, nursing home care, and home health care;
  3. limited coverage for only a specific illness or disease, or fixed indemnity insurance; and
  4. supplemental health benefits.

Benefits in the second category, health benefits of limited scope, are only excepted if such benefits “wrap around” certain individual health insurance coverage. Under federal regulations proposed in 2013,[3] “wraparound” coverage would be available in limited circumstances for employees who could not otherwise afford an employer’s group health plan coverage and who instead obtain medical coverage through the individual market. The wraparound coverage would be designed to supplement the coverage that these employees purchased through the individual market and would be considered an excepted benefit not subject to the ACA protections that were codified in ERISA, the Code, and the PHSA. The relevant federal agencies include the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury (collectively, “Departments”).

The 2013 proposed regulations enumerated five conditions that wraparound coverage would need to meet in order to constitute an excepted benefit.[4] In the final regulations that were published on October 1, 2014, the Departments deferred acting on the five proposed conditions, stating their intent to publish another round of proposed regulations to address the extensive comments received on the issue of limited wraparound coverage.[5] This is the topic addressed by the Proposed Regulations.

Five Requirements Under the Proposed Regulations

In the current version of the Proposed Regulations, the Departments address requirements for limited benefits that would wrap around either individual insurance or coverage under a Multi-State Plan. Specifically, the Department proposes five requirements that such coverage would need to meet to constitute excepted benefits.

First, the limited wraparound coverage could not just be coverage of cost-sharing amounts under an eligible individual health plan but would instead have to provide meaningful benefits. Such benefits could include expanded coverage within a network or coverage of additional benefits not covered under individual insurance. The Departments seek comment on the prospect of standardizing the benefits provided in the limited wraparound coverage, although no such standardization is proposed here.

Second, the limited wraparound coverage must be limited in amount to an annual cost of coverage per employee of $2,500 (indexed according to section 125(i)(2) of the Code). The Departments have switched to a proposed specific dollar figure limit as opposed to a previously proposed percentage cap for ease of administration. The Departments seek comment on the impact of this limit.

Third, the limited wraparound coverage must meet specific requirements related to nondiscrimination, including a prohibition against imposing any preexisting condition exclusion or discrimination based on any health factor.

Fourth, the individuals eligible for the limited wraparound coverage cannot also be enrolled in excepted benefit coverage that is a health flexible spending arrangement. Additionally, plans would need to comply with two sets of eligibility standards: one for individual health insurance for individuals who are not full-time employees and the other for Multi-State Plan (“MSP”) coverage. Of note, because the MSP program is administered through the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) and coverage is issued by insurers through contracts with the OPM, limited wraparound coverage offered as part of such plans would need to be specifically approved by OPM.

Fifth, the Departments would require reporting to the Department of Health and Human Services for both individual health insurance and MSP coverage—and to OPM as well for MSP coverage.

Additional Comments Requested

Notably, the Proposed Regulations would implement limited wraparound coverage as a pilot program with a sunset date. The wraparound coverage could be offered no later than December 31, 2017, and would end on the later of two possible dates. The Departments seek comment on this proposed time frame, including whether the Departments should have the option to terminate such coverage earlier.

In addition to comments on the Proposed Regulations, the Departments also seek comment regarding how small businesses offer health coverage, including whether modifications to health flexible spending arrangements or other existing policies relevant to small businesses would be helpful to small business employers and employees.

Recognizing that some employers, if given the choice, may elect to increase the affordability of their primary coverage rather than offer limited wraparound coverage, the Departments are interested in finding out the degree to which the Proposed Regulations might increase employers’ propensity to provide health insurance. 

*      *     *

The Departments are accepting comments on the Proposed Regulations through January 22, 2015.

*      *     *

This Client Alert was authored by Helaine I. Fingold and Meghan F. Weinberg. For additional information about the issues discussed in this Client Alert, please contact one of the authors or the Epstein Becker Green attorney who regularly handles your legal matters.


[1] The Proposed Regulations were later published at 79 Fed. Reg. 76931 (Dec. 23, 2014), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2014-12-23/pdf/2014-30010.pdf.

[2] Id.at 76932.

[3] 78 Fed. Reg. 77632 (Dec. 24, 2013), available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-12-24/pdf/2013-30553.pdf.

[5] 79 Fed. Reg. 59131 (Oct. 1, 2014), available athttp://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-10-01/pdf/2014-23323.pdf.


Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.