Parties to transactions that are reportable under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements (HSR) Act must observe a mandatory pre-close waiting period—30 days for most transactions—after reporting the transaction to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The agency charged with reviewing the transaction can seek additional time by either (1) asking the parties to pull and refile their reporting forms, restarting the waiting period, or (2) issuing a second request for more information, which then gives the reviewing agency another 30 days after the parties certify their substantial compliance with the second request.

As the volume and complexity of transactions have increased over the years, and staffing levels have remained relatively flat, agency requests for more time have become commonplace. The FTC’s effort to “modernize” the HSR reporting form, requiring transacting parties to provide the agencies with even more information, will likely add to the burden of reviewing reported transactions.

According to FTC Chair Lina Khan and fellow Commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, the HSR Act itself must now be “modernized for today’s economy.” As noted in Chair Khan’s statement accompanying the annual report on the FTC and DOJ’s administration of the HSR Act, the statutory waiting periods “were set in an era where lawmakers expected the agencies would receive around 150 merger notifications per year—rather than 150 per month,” and the “FTC staff are routinely at the mercy of the merging parties granting extensions of the statutory deadlines so that staff has the necessary time to review the transaction.”

If the HSR Act is modernized, as Chair Khan requests, a review process that can already take upwards of a year will no doubt take longer.

* * *

For additional information about the issues discussed above, or if you have any other antitrust concerns, please contact the Epstein Becker Green attorney who regularly handles your legal matters, or one of the authors of this Antitrust Byte:

E. John Steren
Member of the Firm
Patricia Wagner
General Counsel / Chief Privacy Officer
Jeremy Morris
Member of the Firm
Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.