We invite you to view Employment Law This Week® - a weekly rundown of the latest news in the field, brought to you by Epstein Becker Green. We look at the latest trends, important court decisions, and new developments that could impact your work. Join us every Monday for a new five-minute episode! Read the firm's press release here and subscribe for updates.

For our final show of the year, we’re looking back at the biggest employment, workforce, and management issues in 2016, as featured in EBG’s Take 52016 Wrap Up:

This week's stories include . . .

(1) Impact of the Defend Trade Secrets Act

This year saw significant developments in the law governing trade secrets and non-competes. The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) opened federal courts to trade secrets claims, regardless of the dollar value. Jonathan Shapiro of Epstein Becker Green comments:

"Because the DTSA's remedies largely overlap with those already available at state law, it's not a radical expansion of available remedies. But the law is still of great significance to employers, both because the provision of jurisdiction in federal court and the forthcoming creation of a uniform body of federal law in this area."

Click here for more: http://bit.ly/2gQcMRy

(2) States Called to Ban Non-Compete Agreements

The DTSA does include some unique provisions - whistleblower protections in some cases and an ex-parte seizure provision for some extreme circumstances. The political winds blew steadily against non-compete clauses in 2016. Pressure from the federal government culminated in a White House “call to action” encouraging states to ban non-compete agreements in some circumstances. Jonathan Shapiro continues:

"Consistent with the White House's call to action, Illinois passed the Illinois Freedom to Work Act, barring non-compete agreements for workers who earn the greater of the federal state or local minimum wage or $13/hour. Utah enacted a law limiting restrictive covenants entered into on or after May 1st, 2016, to one year post-termination, subject to certain limitations. Rhode Island and Connecticut both enacted laws this year restricting physician non-competes. And finally, Alabama codified a more middle of the road approach, allowing two year non-compete and 18 month non-solicitation clauses for employees, provided that they are limited to the geographic area where the company operates a similar business."

(3) Paid Sick Leave Laws Expand

Paid sick leave emerged as a major issue on the state and federal level this year. Sick leave laws mandate paid time off for employees to deal with their own health issues and care for sick family members. Eight of these laws took effect this year and another 10 are on the horizon for 2017, including paid sick leave for employees who work on certain federal contracts. Overall, there are 39 paid sick leave laws currently in effect or that will become effective in the next two years.

Click here for more: http://bit.ly/2hz0Gx2

(4) Transgender Employment Law

This year has also brought expanded protections for transgender employees. Most of the change has come not from the courts, but from the executive branch. Through guidance, rulemaking and litigation, the EEOC and Justice Department have worked to expand Title VII to include discrimination based on gender identity. President Obama has also issued executive orders increasing protections. But the new administration brings uncertainty, and these initiatives could easily be rolled back, increasing the significance of the court cases brought by private individuals.

Click here for more: http://bit.ly/2hzb7kq

(5) Uncertainty Over the DOL’s Overtime Rule and Salary Thresholds

No issue has created more challenges for employers in 2016 than overtime. Companies worked most of the year to comply with the Department’s new salary thresholds for white collar workers. Just before the regulations were scheduled to go into effect, a federal judge in Texas issued a preliminary nationwide injunction. The DOL has appealed and requested expedited review, but no decision will come before President-elect Trump takes office. Under the new administration, the Department could choose to concede the case, eliminating the new salary thresholds all together.

Click here for more: http://bit.ly/2hLsrD7

(6) NLRB Addresses Joint Employment

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) was extremely active this year, with many of its decisions favoring unions and workers. Laura Monaco of Epstein Becker Green comments on how the Board addressed joint employment in 2016.

"The Board continued to take an expansive approach towards joint employment this year. Last year, in the Browning-Ferriscase, the Board expanded the definition of when two entities could be considered joint employers. And this year, in their decision in Miller & Anderson, they took it another step further. In the Miller & Andersoncase, the Board found that temporary employees, so, for example, staffing agency employees, could organize into a single unit with an employer's direct hires, even if the employer did not consent to that arrangement. … So, employers need to remain mindful, not only of how their supervisors interact with temporary employees on a day-to-day basis, but also what their contracts say with, for example, temporary staffing agencies, how much authority they potentially could exert over those temporary employees."

Click here for more: http://bit.ly/2hTjVOD

(7) NLRB Rules on Union Organizing

This year, the Board helped to expand union organizing with cases like Trustees of Columbia University, where it ruled that graduate students and research assistants can unionize and engage in collective bargaining as employees. The NLRB also continued its aggressive treatment of policies and handbooks in nonunion settings.  It is unclear what lasting impact these decisions will have, as President-elect Trump will likely appoint a new majority to the Board along with a new General Counsel next year. But employers will continue to feel the effect of these rulings, at least in the short term.

Tune in each week for developments that may affect your business. Click here to subscribe by email - select the checkbox next to Employment Law This Week.

Trouble viewing the video? Please contact thisweek@ebglaw.com and mention whether you were at home or working within a corporate network. We'd also love your suggestions for topics and guests!

EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® is a registered trademark of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

WORKFORCE (re)imagined.TM

Employers are strategically preparing for business beyond the pandemic. Stay up to date as you reimagine your workforce.

Trouble viewing the video? Please contact thisweek@ebglaw.com and mention whether you were at home or working within a corporate network. We'd also love your suggestions for topics and guests!

EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® is a registered trademark of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

Prefer to Listen?

You can listen to Employment Law This Week episodes on your preferred platform, including new episodes of our special series, Employers and the New AdministrationApple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify, Stitcher.

Spread the Word


Would your colleagues, professional network, or friends benefit from Diagnosing Health Care? Please share the edition each week on LinkedInFacebookYouTubeInstagram, and Twitter, and your connections can subscribe for email notifications.

Back to Series
Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.