Click above or watch via YouTubeVimeoMP4, or WMV.

We invite you to view Employment Law This Week® - a weekly rundown of the latest news in the field, brought to you by Epstein Becker Green. We look at the latest trends, important court decisions, and new developments that could impact your work. Join us every Monday for a new five-minute episode! Read the firm's press release here and subscribe for updates.

This week’s stories include ...

(1) D.C. Circuit Overturns NLRB Joint-Employer Case

Our top story: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reverses the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) in a joint-employer case. A three-judge panel held that the NLRB did not follow consistent precedents in finding that CNN was a joint employer of a group of contracted technicians. The NLRB decided this case prior to changing the joint-employer standard in Browning Ferris. So,the court did not consider the new indirect control standard. Instead, the court focused only on how the NLRB’s previous test was applied in this case. Employers and other interested parties continue to await the court’s ruling in Browning-Ferristo see whether it will reject the looser test that the Board adopted there. John Fullerton, of Epstein Becker Green, has more:

“In its well-publicized decision in Browning-Ferris in August of 2015, the Board reviewed decades of joint-employer precedent, acknowledged that direct and immediate control had been the applicable standard in the past but decided to overrule or reverse that standard and implement a new standard going forward. The issue is that the CNN decision of the Board came down in March of 2015, five months prior to the Browning-Ferris decision. And, in the CNN decision, the Board did not apply the direct and immediate control standard that the Browning-Ferris decision said was the applicable standard in the past. The Court of Appeals vacated the unfair labor practice charges that were based on the joint-employer finding against CNN, because the Board had not engaged in a proper analysis or explanation of why it was departing from the existing joint-employer standard.”

Watch the extended interview here.

(2) Marvin Kaplan Confirmed for NLRB Seat

The NLRB gains a second Republican member, but the Republican chairman announces he’ll leave the Board later this year. A week after the Senate confirmed President Trump’s first nominee, Marvin Kaplan, to a seat on the NLRB, current Chair Philip Miscimarra announced that he will not seek a second term. His term expires on December 16 of this year. A Senate vote on the nomination of William Emanuel, President Trump’s second Board nominee, has not been scheduled, but it is expected in September. Emanuel’s confirmation would give Republicans a 3-2 majority for the first time in nine years, at least until Miscimarra departs.

For more, click here:

(3) Eighth Circuit Nixes Non-Compete for Independent Contractor

An independent contractor bought supplies from a farm company in Iowa and sold them at a markup. After he ended his relationship with the business, he sold competing products to the customer base that he built while contracting with the company. The company sued, alleging violation of its non-compete agreement. The three-judge panel upheld a district court decision releasing the contractor from the agreement. The Eighth Circuit concluded that the defendant’s customers belonged to him rather than the company, and that the agreement was not necessary to protect the business. Thus, the Eighth Circuit found the non-compete to be unreasonable and unenforceable.

For more, click here:

(4) Chicago Police Officers Lose Overtime Suit for Off-Duty Work

Where there is no uniform policy discouraging overtime reporting, there is no violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act for failing to pay overtime that was not reported, says the Seventh Circuit. A collective of Chicago police officers claimed that they failed to receive overtime pay for off-duty work performed on city-issued BlackBerrys. The Seventh Circuit found that the Chicago Police Department had a process allowing the police officers to record overtime hours worked, but the officers did not submit these off-duty hours for overtime pay. The Seventh Circuit also found that there was no policy or practice to discourage the officers from reporting these hours.

(5) Tip of the Week

Tracy Van Duston, Senior Recruiter and Account Manager at NRI Staffing, provides some advice on implementing a painless recruitment process:

“Here are five tips to help you implement a painless recruitment process and minimize risk. Number one, put in more work up front. Really take the time to analyze the position to gain a clear idea of what you’re looking for in a candidate. Number two, if this is an established position, ask yourself what personality traits and soft skills have worked well in the past. Also ask yourself what has not worked well. What career path and skill growth does this position offer? Ensure that the position you're hiring for will align with the long-term goals of your potential new hire. Number four: How fast do you hire? Are you setting realistic expectations up front with your candidates on your hiring timeline? And last, who’s in charge of checking or re-checking references—your HR department or the hiring manager or supervisor? Often, we find that a supervisor speaking directly to a previous manager can provide valuable insight on how to successfully manage and develop your new hire.”

Tune in each week for developments that may affect your business. Click here to subscribe by email - select the checkbox next to Employment Law This Week.

Trouble viewing the video? Please contact and mention whether you were at home or working within a corporate network. We'd also love your suggestions for topics and guests!

EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® is a registered trademark of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

WORKFORCE (re)imagined.TM

Employers are strategically preparing for business beyond the pandemic. Stay up to date as you reimagine your workforce.

Trouble viewing the video? Please contact and mention whether you were at home or working within a corporate network. We'd also love your suggestions for topics and guests!

EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® is a registered trademark of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

Prefer to Listen?

You can listen to Employment Law This Week episodes on your preferred platform, including new episodes of our special series, Employers and the New AdministrationApple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify, Stitcher.

Spread the Word


Would your colleagues, professional network, or friends benefit from Diagnosing Health Care? Please share the edition each week on LinkedInFacebookYouTubeInstagram, and Twitter, and your connections can subscribe for email notifications.

Back to Series
Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.