We invite you to view Employment Law This Week- a weekly rundown of the latest news in the field, brought to you by Epstein Becker Green. We look at the latest trends, important court decisions, and new developments that could impact your work. Join us every Monday for a new five-minute episode! Read the firm's press release here and subscribe for updates.

This week's topics ...

(1) FLSA Lawsuits Hit Record in 2015

Our top story this week: Fair Labor Standards Act lawsuits hit a record high in 2015. The number of federal wage-and-hour suits rose almost 8% this year. There are many reasons for the increase, including more worker-friendly rules and increased publicity around minimum wage and overtime issues. Some point to the difficulties of applying an outdated law to our modern-day economy. Jeff Ruzal from Epstein Becker Green goes into further detail. Update: See the extended interview here.

(2) Restrictive Covenant Binds Bad Leaver

A bad leaver pays a hefty price. . . . A former VP of Fortinet, Inc., must pay nearly $1.7 million to the company, after poaching three of his subordinates when he left his job for a competitor. The former VP joked in an email that the employees he took with him were “three bullets to the back of the head” of his former employer. In the arbitration, a former California state judge ruled that the former VP had breached his fiduciary duty and his contractual obligations not to recruit employees of the company for a year after he left.
Click here for more information.

(3) Ninth Circuit Urged to Revisit PAGA Ruling

Business groups ask the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to reconsider its Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) waiver ruling. The Ninth Circuit accepted three amicus briefs from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other businesses, asking the court to rethink its ruling. The Ninth Circuit’s split decision in September found that class action waivers for California employees are unenforceable under the PAGA. This ruling reaffirmed the California Supreme Court’s 2014 Iskanian ruling.

(4) Temp Worker Qualifies as Employee in Title VII Claim

Temp workers are considered employees in a race bias suit. The Third Circuit recently ruled that a temp worker assigned to a retail store can be considered an employee of that retailer. The plaintiff is alleging that management at Tuesday Morning retail stores discriminated against African-American employees, resulting in their termination. The court found that there is a “common-law employment relationship” between the temp workers and the retailer that satisfies the requirements for claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This decision supports a growing consensus in the courts and from regulators that a company will likely be considered a joint employer if it controls the day-to-day activities of a temp worker. Click here for more on the NLRB’s ruling.

(5) Tip of the Week

Kathy Williams of Epstein Becker Green gives helpful advice on how to keep holiday parties free of employment issues. Update: See the extended interview here.

Tune in each week for developments that may affect your business. Click here to subscribe by email - select the checkbox next to Employment Law This Week.

Trouble viewing the video? Please contact thisweek@ebglaw.com and mention whether you were at home or working within a corporate network. We'd also love your suggestions for topics and guests!

WORKFORCE (re)imagined.TM

Employers are strategically preparing for business beyond the pandemic. Stay up to date as you reimagine your workforce.

Trouble viewing the video? Please contact thisweek@ebglaw.com and mention whether you were at home or working within a corporate network. We'd also love your suggestions for topics and guests!

EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® is a registered trademark of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

Prefer to Listen?

You can listen to Employment Law This Week episodes on your preferred platform, including new episodes of our special series, Employers and the New AdministrationApple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify, Stitcher.

Spread the Word


Would your colleagues, professional network, or friends benefit from Diagnosing Health Care? Please share the edition each week on LinkedInFacebookYouTubeInstagram, and Twitter, and your connections can subscribe for email notifications.

Back to Series
Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.