We invite you to view Employment Law This Week® - a weekly rundown of the latest news in the field, brought to you by Epstein Becker Green. We look at the latest trends, important court decisions, and new developments that could impact your work. Join us every Monday for a new five-minute episode! Read the firm's press release here and subscribe for updates.

This week’s stories include ...

(1) Nation's First Website Accessibility Trial

Our top story: The verdict is in: Winn-Dixie must make its website accessible. A visually impaired individual sued the grocery chain because his screen reader could not process the store locator and coupon sections of the chain’s website. In what is believed to be the first federal decision on website accessibility, a district court judge in Florida found that Winn-Dixie violated Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act by not providing a fully accessible public website. He ordered the grocery chain to make the entire website accessible, even sections that may be run by a third party. Joshua Stein, from Epstein Becker Green, has more:

“There were two aspects to the Winn-Dixie holding that I found particularly striking. The first was just how little the court required to establish a nexus between the website and the brick-and-mortar stores. In this case, you can't even purchase goods from a Winn-Dixie store on their website. All you could do was identify store locations, find coupons, and upload those coupons to your discount cards to bring them into the store. Nevertheless, the court found this was sufficient for a nexus to apply. Second, the court expanded the obligations for accessibility well beyond what most settlement agreements have found to date, requiring that Winn-Dixie make third-party avenues of its website accessible as well. This didn't just apply to advertisers that might have a contract with Winn-Dixie but also to tech giants like Google, where Winn-Dixie clearly had no control over their applications.”

Watch the extended interview here and read Joshua Stein's recent blog post.

(2) DOJ Reverses Position on Class Waiver Agreements

The Department of Justice (DOJ) reversed its position on whether mandatory class action waivers violate the National Labor Relations Act. The DOJ has filed a brief arguing that mandatory class action waivers are enforceable in employment arbitration agreements. The brief was filed in a consolidated set of cases to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court. The DOJ took the opposite position last year while representing the National Labor Relations Board in these same cases. The DOJ acknowledged as much in its brief but stated that, after the change in administration, it had reached the opposite conclusion.

(3) Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Sexual Harassment Claims

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of sexual harassment claims after decisive remedial action by the employer. In the suit brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, three female employees claimed that they were sexually harassed by a store manager. The Sixth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the action, finding that the employer established an affirmative defense by promptly investigating and then terminating the manager’s employment. In addition, the Sixth Circuit held that the manager was not a “supervisor” under the law, because he did not have authority to take tangible employment actions against the employees, which would have held the employer to a higher standard.

(4) Several Employment Laws Take Effect July 1

A number of new state and local labor laws and regulations are set to go into effect on July 1. Paid sick leave laws will take effect in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota; Chicago and Cook County, Illinois; and the state of Arizona. In Seattle, an ordinance will go into effect that requires employers to post schedules at least 14 days before a work shift. And California’s new regulations limiting the ability of employers to consider criminal history in employment decisions will also take effect. In December of this year, Delaware will become the first state to prohibit employers from asking applicants about compensation history.

(5) Tip of the Week

Christina Berti, Director and Associate General Counsel for Deutsche Bank, shares some advice on best practices for an effective whistleblower retaliation investigation:

“Whistleblower retaliation investigations are becoming all the more frequent lately, given our increased regulatory environment. You want to create a dialogue with the whistleblower to explain the process of the investigation, give status reports on its progress, and ultimately deliver the outcome. You always want to be responsive to the whistleblower's requests to provide you additional information after your initial intake meeting. In this way, you'll be apprised of any new developments which may impact your findings. And lastly, as a final closing tip, it’s really important to coordinate with your HR and legal advisory teams, in terms of any new developments that might occur during the course of the investigation that may impact the whistleblower and other relevant witnesses who are active employees.”

About Employment Law This Week

Employment Law This Week® gives a rundown of the top developments in employment and labor law and workforce management in a matter of minutes every #WorkforceWednesday. 


Prefer to Listen?

You can subscribe to Employment Law This Week episodes on your preferred podcast platform – Amazon Music / AudibleApple Podcasts, Audacy, DeezerGoogle PodcastsiHeartRadio, Overcast, PandoraPlayer FM, Spotify.

Spread the Word


Would your colleagues, professional network, or friends benefit from #WorkforceWednesday? Please like and share the edition each week on LinkedInFacebook, X, and YouTube, and encourage your connections to subscribe for email notifications.

Trouble viewing the video? Please contact thisweek@ebglaw.com and mention whether you were at home or working within a corporate network. We'd also love your suggestions for topics and guests!

EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® is a registered trademark of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

Back to Series
Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.