Paul DeCamp, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC office, was quoted in Human Resource Executive, in “DOL Issues Proposed Rule on Fluctuating Workweeks,” by Nick Otto.

Following is an excerpt:

The DOL on Monday issued a proposal that would give employers more flexibility in calculating overtime pay for non-exempt salaried workers with fluctuating schedules.

The fluctuating workweek method is a way of calculating overtime pay for non-exempt employees who are paid a fixed salary, but whose hours fluctuate from week to week. The fluctuating workweek method can be extremely advantageous for employers, experts say, because it allows an employer to pay a non-exempt employee a fixed salary covering all of the employee’s straight-time work, regardless of the number of hours worked.

The regulation would clarify the Fair Labor Standards Act’s fluctuating workweek compensation method.

The new rule would allow employers to include bonuses and other incentives in the regular rate calculation, rescinding language from an Obama-era rule. Verbiage in a preamble to a 2011 regulation suggested paying bonuses is inconsistent with fluctuating work, says Paul DeCamp, an attorney with the law firm Epstein Becker Green.

The DOL’s new proposal aims to clear up confusion caused by the DOL’s foray into rulemaking in 2011, which was more a half measure and left courts scratching their heads, he explains.

“We saw court cases arising where the same employer offering the same bonus plan in different courts were reaching different outcomes,” DeCamp says. “One court saying payment of bonus defeats the fluctuating workweek and another court saying it does not.”

The department’s proposal could make calculating these wages more consistent and easier to apply across the board.

For example, some jurisdictions, like California, say fluctuating workweeks are unlawful, he says.

There, DeCamp illustrates, for an employee making $1,000, that salary would be allocated only to the first 40 hours. Each hour after those 40 would be time and a half at $37.50.

Alternatively, elsewhere under federal law, that $1,000 salary would be spread out over 50 hours in a workweek, so the overtime pay there would be $100 instead of $375 dollars in California for an additional 10 hours of overtime.

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.