Paul DeCamp, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC, office, was quoted in Law360 Employment Authority, in “Midterm Primary Democrats Push Minimum Wage Hike,” by Max Kutner. (Read the full version – subscription required.)

Following is an excerpt:

As the U.S. Senate and House midterm primaries enter their busiest month, Democratic candidates have made increasing the federal minimum wage a campaign issue, while efforts in the current Congress have stalled.

In June, midterm primaries or runoffs will take place in 22 states. More than two dozen candidates with upcoming or previous races have campaigned on platforms calling for raising the federal minimum wage from $7.25 an hour, where it has been since 2009.

The primaries are happening as current lawmakers' efforts to raise the federal wage floor appear stuck. The Raise the Wage Act, which called for an increase to $15 an hour, hasn't advanced since lawmakers introduced it in January 2021, and Democrats' attempts to include a $15 provision in a COVID-19 relief package and an infrastructure bill failed.

President Joe Biden has continued advocating for a $15 hourly wage floor, including in his March State of the Union speech, and he has signed executive orders paving the way for such pay bumps for federal employees and federal contract workers. …

Here, Law360 looks at how the minimum wage debate has appeared in the midterm primaries.

Mixed Results For Pro-Hike Candidates

In midterm primaries that have already taken place, some Democratic candidates who advocated for raising the federal minimum wage have won, while others have lost. In some instances, those losses were to candidates who did not appear to mention minimum wage in their platforms. …

Paul DeCamp of management-side firm Epstein Becker Green, who led the U.S. Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division under President George W. Bush, said differences between primary candidates typically are minimal.

"At the primary stage, when you have people in the same party competing against each other, you're not necessarily going to see wildly differing views on these topics," DeCamp said. "I don't think that anybody who lost a primary on the Democratic side lost because of their position on minimum wage." …

Uncertainty In Current Senate

Given the lack of movement on the Raise the Wage Act, and failed efforts to work minimum wage into other legislation, it seems unlikely that the current Congress will bump the wage floor before its session expires, observers said.

Republican opponents of the wage hike have pointed to a Congressional Budget Office report from February 2021 that said an increase to $15 an hour would result in 1.4 million people losing jobs by 2025, even as millions of other workers would see pay bumps.

"A $15 minimum wage at the federal level in this Congress is exceedingly unlikely," said Epstein Becker Green's DeCamp. "The politics of the moment appear to call for candidates to fight about $15 rather than compromising at, say, $10 or $12."

If the increase doesn't happen in this Democrat-controlled Congress, eyes will be on whether Republicans take control of either or both chambers in the midterms.

Of the nine times that Congress has amended the Fair Labor Standards Act to raise minimum wage, Democrats controlled both chambers except once, in 1996, during the Bill Clinton administration. In that instance, Republicans controlled both chambers. …
 
But DeCamp said there could potentially be more movement on the issue under Republicans because the $15 figure would be off the table.

"There is a significant number of Republican legislators who seem willing, with the backing of the business community, to agree to some increase in the federal minimum wage," DeCamp said.

Services

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.