Stuart M. Gerson, Member of the Firm in the Litigation and Health Care & Life Sciences practices, in the firm’s Washington, DC, and New York offices, was quoted in SHRM, in “Employee Protections from Retaliation Have Grown During Breyer’s Tenure,” by Allen Smith.

Following is an excerpt:

Justice Stephen Breyer will retire from the U.S. Supreme Court after the Senate confirms his successor and after the end of the current session—most likely in late June or early July, bringing an end to his influence on employment law. He has written several opinions affecting employers and workers over the years, most notably opinions expanding employees' protections from retaliation and upholding the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Breyer's Legacy …

Breyer notably observed the following: "Why would Congress want to limit the enforcement scheme's effectiveness by inhibiting use of the act's complaint procedure by those who would find it difficult to reduce their complaints to writing—particularly illiterate, less educated or overworked workers?" He noted that President Franklin Roosevelt, who signed the FLSA into law in 1938, pointed out that "these were the workers most in need of the act's help."

The most significant two cases upholding the ACA were National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. Sebelius in 2012 and California v. Texas in 2021.

"Breyer did not write [the decision in] NFIB v. Sebelius, but he was instrumental in moving the liberal votes to forge an alliance with Chief Justice [John] Roberts," said Stuart Gerson, an attorney with Epstein Becker Green in Washington, D.C., and New York City. "Last term, Breyer assured the survival and continuation of the ACA by marshalling a unified seven-vote bloc of liberals and conservatives for his opinion in California v. Texas."

Gerson described Breyer as "a consummate insider, looking to harmonize competing views into consensus positions that were pragmatic solutions to what he perceived as national policy goals."

Breyer showed his preference for regulatory solutions with his dissent in this year's NFIB v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, an opinion that blocked the vaccine-or-testing requirement for large employers, Gerson added.

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.