Steven M. Swirsky, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s New York office, was quoted in The National Law Journal, in “Trump’s Firing of NLRB Member Could Spark Review of Supreme Court Precedent,” by Avalon Zoppo. (Read the full version – subscription required.)

Following is an excerpt:

Steve Swirsky, co-chair of Epstein Becker Green’s labor-management relations practice group, agreed Wilcox’s firing could lead to Humphrey’s Executor being revisited if she brings a complaint, with the Trump administration potentially arguing the justices were incorrect to say there’s no separation-of-powers problems with for-cause removal shields at agencies like the FTC.

Swirsky said the administration could also argue that the precedent doesn’t apply in Wilcox’ situation because the NLRB is statutorily structured differently than the FTC.

The NLRB’s enabling legislation is unique in that it states members are appointed by the president to five-year terms but doesn’t specify that the board must be balanced on partisan lines, Swirsky said. The Federal Trade Commission Act, by contrast, says no more than three commissioners can be of the same political party.

He predicted that the justices would likely "be receptive to the administration's arguments about Humphrey’s either not being good law still or it being distinguishable on these facts."

"I do expect that that they [would] argue that Humphrey's is no longer good law, or at minimum, that if it stands, that it doesn't apply here," Swirsky said.

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.