Steven M. Swirsky, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management and Health Care and Life Sciences practices, in the firm’s New York office, was quoted in Law360, in “NLRB Joint Employer Test Still in Limbo Despite New Member,” by Vin Gurrieri. (Read the full version – subscription required.)

Following is an excerpt:

With the D.C. Circuit tightening the screws on the National Labor Relations Board to firmly establish a joint employer standard, Wednesday’s confirmation of former Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP attorney John Ring may not be enough to quickly break through the ethical logjam that doomed the board’s attempt to put a more employer-friendly standard in place late last year, lawyers say.

Ring was confirmed by the Senate on Wednesday by a vote of 50-48, returning the board to a full complement of five members, including three Republicans and two Democrats. Longstanding tradition at the NLRB requires that at least three members vote in favor of overturning existing cases or establishing new precedents or legal standards, meaning that the board is now in a position to do away with numerous controversial Obama-era decisions.

Once Ring is seated, one of first items on the board’s to-do list will likely be another attempt at resolving the contentious issue of what the board’s standard should be for determining whether a business can be considered a joint employer. …

Steve Swirsky of Epstein Becker Green said the NLRB is “in relatively unprecedented territory” in regard to the apparent internal strife between Robb, the board members and the inspector general.

“It’s hard to know exactly when and how we’re going to get there, but I think we’re going to end up with some version of [Hy-Brand] or in the context of the D.C. Circuit saying … that the Browning-Ferris test for joint employer is not going to stand.”

With Ring returning the NLRB to a Republican majority, Swirsky said “there’s a good chance that when the right case gets before them … the board will revisit this and come up with something that is going to look a lot like Hy-Brand.”

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.