Sarah M. Hall, Member of the Firm in the Health Care & Life Sciences practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC, office, was quoted in Bloomberg Law Business & Practice, in “Executives Face Perils When Confessing to DOJ as Companies Gain,” by Ben Penn. (Read the full version – subscription required.)

Following is an excerpt:

The Justice Department’s elevated incentives to entice corporations into disclosing internal wrongdoing is illuminating ambiguity when executives want to step forward.

Exposing their company’s potential offenses to law enforcement has long been risky for those with criminal exposure. Whether trying to get in front of an investigation or experiencing genuine remorse, their chances of avoiding prison vary by prosecutor, district, and judge.

The absence of a road map is more evident when contrasted with new Justice Department policies, some defense attorneys say. DOJ’s Criminal Division and US attorney offices announced guidelines this year to encourage self-disclosures by offering greater transparency and leniency. But the carrot applies only when corporations come clean, not their employees.

That’s left white-collar defense lawyers struggling to offer confident advice to people interested in fessing up and implicating others, in exchange for a generous deal. …

Risky Negotiations

DOJ does have a history within certain offices of rewarding cooperating executives with non-prosecution agreements or recommending little to no prison time for those pleading guilty.

A department spokesman pointed to prosecutors’ consideration of a variety of published procedures on how individual cooperators can receive reduced sentences or immunity, such as US sentencing guidelines, principles of federal prosecution, and the Antitrust Division’s leniency program.

However, there are countless ways cooperation can backfire. …

It could be especially dangerous when approaching the government “out of the clear blue sky and saying, ‘Hey, I’ve got this client, they might have some criminal exposure, do you want to talk?’” said Sarah Hall, a former fraud section attorney who’s now a partner at Epstein Becker & Green.

“You have to give DOJ enough to interest them,” she added. But at the same time, “you might have just revealed enough for them to go off on their own and investigate your client.”

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.