Richard H. Hughes, IV, Member of the Firm in the Health Care & Life Sciences practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC, office, was quoted in POLITICO Pro, in “Scientists and RFK Jr. Want Vaccine Data—for Very Different Reasons,” by Lauren Gardner. (Read the full version – subscription required.)

Following is an excerpt:

Trump campaign surrogate and anti-vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he wants to see more data on vaccine safety.

So do public health experts and vaccine scientists — but for different reasons.

Four vaccine experts this summer called on Congress to boost funding to study the safety of vaccines already on the market. They hope to use an established excise tax that drugmakers pay into an injury compensation fund that’s long run a surplus, which they say wouldn’t trigger pay-for rules or cut into payments for patients. It’s not because they fear shots pose undue risks; rather, they argue, flagging public confidence in the immunization system demands it. …

The no-fault system generally shields companies from an onslaught of litigation that could drain resources and prompt their exit from the vaccine market — which is what occurred in the early 1980s when a raft of lawsuits were filed over alleged injuries from the pertussis vaccine.

If drug companies lost their protection, they could be subsumed under an avalanche of litigation. Even if it is mostly frivolous, the drug companies might decide to abandon the vaccine market rather than deal with the headache for a product that makes them a relatively small profit.

“You take away those liability protections from manufacturers, you are going to see a collapse in the vaccines marketplace,” said Richard Hughes IV, a health lawyer at Epstein Becker Green who was a public policy executive at Moderna during the Covid pandemic.

Indeed, many manufacturers stopped making the pertussis shot, which dramatically lowered incidences of whooping cough in the U.S. — but also, in rare instances, caused febrile seizures. A different vaccine technology for pertussis replaced that product in the U.S. in the early 1990s.

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.