Richard H. Hughes, IV, Member of the Firm in the Health Care & Life Sciences practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC, office, was featured in a video titled Braidwood v Becerra Has Major Implications on Available Preventive Services,” where he responded to questions from Julia Bonavitacola of The American Journal of Managed Care®.

Following is a transcript:

What is the Braidwood v Becerra lawsuit and what does it affect?

So this is a case where the plaintiffs are challenging the requirement under the Affordable Care Act [ACA] to cover certain recommended preventive services. Initially they brought a set of constitutional claims, and they brought claims under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. What the case before the Supreme Court really involves is the constitutional claims, and the remaining claims at this point are only related to the US Preventive Services Task Force.

What's in front of the court right now is the constitutionality of the role of the US Preventive Services Task Force in determining which services must be covered by health insurance plans in the United States, and this is a requirement that impacts not only all Americans who have private health insurance, but also applies directly to the individuals, the adults who also have Medicaid expansion coverage as well.

What are the major implications of the lawsuit when it comes to the ACA?

It is really another one of those significant Affordable Care Act cases, like we've seen in the past, but it's really the first that challenges the preventive services coverage requirement. So it's a really significant case when we think about access to preventive care in the United States. Before the Affordable Care Act, there was no requirement that commercial health insurance plans or Medicaid cover these types of preventive services. So it's definitely something that risks access for over 150 million Americans to recommended preventive care.

How might this lawsuit affect contraception and immunizations covered under the ACA?

So the question before the Supreme Court at this point in time does not involve the Advisory Committee on the Immunization Practices [ACIP], which recommends immunizations, or the recommendations by the Health Resources and Services Administration, or HRSA, which is where we see the contraceptive mandate. So immunizations, the contraceptive mandate, off the table before the court right now. I will say this was an issue that was raised at the lower court level. The plaintiffs did not want to have to cover certain recommended immunizations or contraceptives.

The lower court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on the task force, but not with respect to immunizations and contraceptives. And so the lower court found that the way those bodies operate in determining coverage requirements under the ACA is constitutional, and so that's something that we could see come back up at a later date. Certainly the the plaintiffs did ask the Supreme Court to reconsider the constitutionality of the ACIP and HRSA roles. But for now, contraceptive mandate, immunizations off the table in this case. It's really focused on the US Preventive Services Task Force and required coverage of its recommendations.

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.