Paul DeCamp, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC office, was quoted in Wolters Kluwer's Employment Law Daily Wrap Up—DOL News, in “New FLSA Opinion Letters Include an About-Face on 80/20 Tip Rule,” by Pamela Wolf.

Following is an excerpt (see below to download the full version in PDF format):

The Department of Labor on November 8 released four new opinion letters on FLSA compliance. One of those letters put an end to the controversial so-called 80/20 tip rule governing the employer tip credit when employees perform both tipped and non-tipped job duties. The change will have a huge impact on the restaurant industry and currently ongoing litigation.

80/20 rule rolled back. Opinion Letter FLSA2018-27 reinstates virtually verbatim (the minimum wage amount has changed) a 2009 opinion letter addressing the definition of a “tipped employee” for purposes of the tip credit under which employers may pay tipped employees not less than $2.13 per hour and take a “tip credit” for the difference between paid wages and the federal minimum wage.

There has long been substantial confusion over the application of the tip credit when an employee has dual jobs or related duties that include both tipped and non-tipped work. The DOL has at times relied on guidance that would draw the line where an employee’s non-tipped work exceeds 20 percent of working time—the so-called 80/20 rule.

The November 8, Opinion Letter nixes the 80/20 rule, as a matter of official Wage and Hour Division policy, and as an official ruling for purposes of the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 C.F.R. 259.

Restaurant industry impact. Epstein Becker & Green attorney Paul DeCamp shared his insights on this important development. As he sees it, the DOL has a long history of imposing requirements on restaurants concerning tipped employment that have “no basis at all in the Fair Labor Standards Act.” The DOL’s 80/20 guidance was issued in 1988—one of many examples of the Department exceeding its authority, according to DeCamp. “While perhaps well intentioned, the Department’s regulatory and subregulatory excesses have come under increasing scrutiny in recent years,” he observed.

“What the 80/20 guidance purported to require was for employers to pay tipped employees full minimum wage, rather than the tipped minimum wage, for time spent on so-called side work—tasks like cleaning, preparing the service area, and the like—if the employees spend more than 20 percent of their working time on side work,” DeCamp explained. “Not surprisingly, this guidance led to a huge wave of class actions against restaurant companies across the country.” …

Courts get into the act. Late in 2017, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals originally rejected the 80/20 guidance as contrary to the FLSA, DeCamp pointed out. Subsequently, however, an 11-judge en banc panel of the same appeals court took a different view, upholding the 80/20 guidance by an 8-3 vote.

Following the Ninth Circuit’s en banc ruling, and with the 80/20 guidance still on the books at the DOL, the Restaurant Law Center decided to take action, according to DeCamp. “We filed a lawsuit in federal court in Texas challenging 80/20 as unlawful,” he said. “The government’s response to our complaint is due next week.” …

A few words for employers. DeCamp offered a few suggestions related to the change in guidance. “Employers will still want to exercise caution and common sense when it comes to tipped employees,” he said. “If employees perform side work, it should be in connection with a shift in which the employees are also performing the core duties of their roles. Assigning a server to spend an entire shift, or a significant portion of a shift, in the kitchen washing dishes can still be problematic. But if employers use good judgment and assign side work in a manner consistent with how the industry has assigned side work for decades, the FLSA should no longer present a threat to that practice.”

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.