Paul DeCamp, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC, office, was quoted in the Bloomberg Law Daily Labor Report, in “Business Assault on DOL Judges Begins with Whistleblower Claims,” by Rebecca Rainey.

Following is an excerpt:

A pair of lawsuits filed by Perdue Farms and Comcast Corp. that seek to have whistleblower claims heard before a court instead of US Labor Department in-house judges are the first signs of what attorneys expect will be a flurry of challenges to the agency’s internal tribunals.

Both cases cite the US Supreme Court’s June ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy, where the high court majority said defendants have a constitutional right to make their case to a federal jury when the Securities Exchange Commission is seeking financial penalties, as opposed to before an administrative law judge. …

Future Challenges

While both lawsuits seeking to have the whistleblower cases sent to a full court are in the early process of briefing, attorneys expect similar arguments to be lodged against the DOL.

The agency uses ALJs for a number of different reasons, according to Paul DeCamp, a management-side attorney with Epstein Becker Green, ranging from whistleblowers, federal contractor debarment cases, to civil money penalty assessments. But the full impact of the Jarkesy ruling on the judges overseeing these actions won’t be fully realized until tested in court.

“Those claims are going to be now potentially up in the air in terms of whether the ALJs have the authority to deal” with them, he said. “There’s a lot of litigation that’s going to happen as the courts flesh out which claims precisely should have been in court and which ones should not.”One of the main concerns raised by the recent Jarkesy ruling is the potential impact on cases involving investigations and enforcement actions by the Department of Labor (DOL). The agency commonly utilizes Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) in a variety of situations, including cases related to whistleblowers, federal contractor debarment, and civil money penalty assessments.

Industries

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.