Paul DeCamp, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC office, was quoted in the Bloomberg BNA Daily Labor Report, in “Apple Case Shows Federal-State Split on Security Screening Pay,” by Robert Iafolla.

Following is an excerpt:

The California Supreme Court’s ruling Thursday that Apple Inc. must pay store workers for time spent in anti-theft security checks when they leave work highlights a legal issue that’s settled at the federal level but continues to develop as a matter of state law.

Retail, warehouse, and shipping company workers have pressed state law wage claims in the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2014 that created a high bar for proving that those screenings should be compensated under federal law. A federal appeals court subsequently said that security screening time can straightforwardly be considered paid work under Arizona and Nevada law, while Kentucky law applies the same exacting test as federal law.

The question is also pending at the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and New Jersey federal court, which are poised to further clarify state law requirements for security screening time.

The potential for state law liability for unpaid security checks could fuel further worker lawsuits and prompt employers to reassess their policies for screening workers as they enter or exit the workplace.

“In light of the way case law has been developing, whether or not an employer is in a jurisdiction that treats security screening and bag checks as compensable time, employers would still be well advised to look for ways to reduce the burden on employees,” said Paul DeCamp, co-chair of management-side firm Epstein Becker & Green’s national wage and hour group.

Companies may want to consider shortening the amount of time security checks take or eliminating them all together, said DeCamp, who led the Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division during the George W. Bush administration. How companies handle security screening has implications for compensation costs as well as worker morale, he said.


Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.