Paul DeCamp, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC, office, was quoted in HR Dive in “5th Circuit Signs Off on DOL’s Overtime Salary Basis Test,” by Ryan Golden.

Following is an excerpt:

The 5th’s Circuit decision provides insight into one of the most significant labor and employment law questions to emerge following the U.S. Supreme Court’s overturning of Chevron deference in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. ...

The court’s approach was similar to that used in another recent decision in which it struck down a separate DOL final rule on the FLSA’s tip credit regulations, according to Paul DeCamp, member of the firm at Epstein Becker Green and former administrator of DOL’s Wage and Hour Division. In both cases, DeCamp said, the 5th Circuit focused on the meaning of the FLSA’s statute and used that analysis to determine whether Congress delegated authority to DOL.

Though this resulted in the court ultimately concluding that DOL did have the authority to consider salary, DeCamp said that the 5th Circuit appeared to acknowledge that the Supreme Court could decide the question differently. He added that he expects an appeal of Mayfield.

“I don’t know whether [the plaintiffs] will succeed, but I don’t know that this is the last word on this issue,” DeCamp said.

The 5th Circuit also weighed in on whether the salary basis test implicates the major questions doctrine, under which courts may reject claims of agency authority that concern issues of vast economic or political significance. It concluded that DOL’s 2019 Trump-era overtime rule did not meet either threshold, but the 5th Circuit also noted that there is uncertainty as to the doctrine’s precise use in judicial analysis.

“What we’re looking at is the court struggling to apply that relatively new doctrine,” DeCamp said.

Despite the Mayfield decision, DOL still faces potential legal roadblocks toward implementation of its most recent overtime final rule. A Texas district court has already blocked that rule from taking effect for the state government’s employees.

DeCamp said he advises employers to prepare for federal regulations as if they will take effect, even if a successful court challenge is possible. “If it happens it happens, but employers should always do their best to be prepared,” he added. “As an employer, you don’t want to be caught flat-footed.”

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.