Joshua A. Stein, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s New York office, was quoted in Law360, in “How a Fla. Ruling Ignited a Surge in Online ADA Suits,” by Nathan Hale. (Read the full version – subscription required.)

Following is an excerpt:

In the year since a Florida federal judge became the first to find that a company’s website violated a visually impaired customer’s rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the ruling has been both an inspiration and “bully stick," spurring a surge in litigation that attorneys say could wind up in the U.S. Supreme Court.

U.S. District Judge Robert N. Scola Jr.’s decision in June 2017 against Winn-Dixie Stores Inc. and in favor of blind advocate and Paralympian Juan Carlos Gil did not answer all of the pressing issues and lacks binding authority on other courts, but it has had a significant influence on the landscape of cases claiming ADA violations online.

“It effectively poured gasoline on a fire that was already beginning to burn fairly intensely to motivate plaintiffs across the United States to pursue these claims, even more so than they had already begun doing it,” said Joshua A. Stein, co-chair of the ADA and Public Accommodations Group at Epstein Becker Green. …

The impact of the Winn-Dixie decision was amplified when in the next couple of months two different federal judges in New York denied motions to dismiss from burger chain Five Guys LLC and the retailer Blick Art Materials LLC, and in their respective orders joined Judge Scola in ruling that websites are subject to the ADA and that courts do not need to wait for agency regulations to make a determination on compliance.

“Once those three things happened in succession, just open up the floodgates,” Stein said. …

While web accessibility litigation winds its way toward a possible date before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Justice Department could provide needed clarity and relief much more quickly through regulation, defense attorneys said. They offered strong critiques of the Trump administration’s decision to halt rulemaking, saying it has created a “worst-case scenario” (Stein) …

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.