Nathaniel M. Glasser, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC, office, was featured in a Q&A discussion in the Washington Business Journal, titled “Local LGBTQ Entrepreneurs Tell Us What the Landmark Supreme Court Ruling Means to Them,” by Carolyn M. Proctor. (Read the full version – subscription required.)

Following is an excerpt:

Greater Washington is known to be more progressive than other parts of the country. But within the region, there were differences in the amount of protections previously provided to LGBTQ workers — depending on an employer’s headquarters address. So, we asked a local expert what effect the Supreme Court’s Bostock vs. Clayton County ruling would really have for D.C.-area employers going forward.

Nathaniel Glasser, a member of the firm in the employment, labor and workforce management practice in the D.C. office of law firm Epstein Becker & Green, offered his take, edited here for space and clarity.

What were the LGBTQ protections under D.C., Virginia and Maryland law and regulations before Bostock?

Prior to Bostock, D.C. and Maryland expressly included sexual orientation and gender identity as protected characteristics under their respective human rights laws. While Virginia law did not cover sexual orientation or gender identity discrimination in the private sector, in the spring the General Assembly passed, and Gov. Ralph Northam signed into law, the Virginia Values Act, which, among other things, amended the Virginia Human Rights Act to include sexual orientation and gender identity as protected characteristics. That amendment went into effect on July 1.

How did the previous laws or rules here compare with other parts of the country?

By passing the Virginia Values Act, Virginia became the first southern state to prohibit workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Prior to that, approximately 20 other states prohibited sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in both the public and private sectors. These states include California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York.

So then what, if anything, changes locally under the new Supreme Court decision?

Between the Supreme Court decision and the amendments to Virginia law, we should expect to see more complaints of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity filed in Virginia. While many multistate and national employers in Virginia already have policies prohibiting such discrimination, now that there is a viable path to litigation in that state, more employees may assert such claims. Equally significant is a change to the Virginia Human Rights Act that provides employees with a private right of action in Virginia state court, and we expect more claims to be brought solely under Virginia state law.

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.