Antitrust-Byte

The Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care (“Policy Statements”), issued jointly by the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, provide, at Statement 3, guidelines for evaluating whether a joint venture between two competing hospitals to develop specialized clinical services, including the recruitment of related physician specialists, would generate antitrust risk.

According to Statement 3 of the Policy Statements, the antitrust analysis of these ventures and recruiting efforts involves the following four-step process: (1) the parties should define the relevant market to identify other providers that patients might consider good substitutes; (2) the parties should evaluate the potential anticompetitive effects of the venture (for example, if the venture has a goal of recruiting a particular specialty (such as a neurosurgeon), the venture should evaluate whether an agreement for such recruitment would eliminate a current competitor (e.g., one participant decides to eliminate a current neurosurgeon), and whether the joint venture has other active competitors in the market); (3) the parties should evaluate the procompetitive effects of such a venture (including whether the recruitment strategy improves quality and service to patients in the area); and (4)  the parties should analyze any collateral agreements (e.g., to prevent participants from independently recruiting) to determine whether those agreements are reasonably necessary for the joint venture.

Although collaborative arrangements can raise antitrust concerns, focusing recruiting efforts on clinical specialties where a sufficient volume of patients is necessary to both attract specialist and maintain high-quality care, as well as limiting non-related collateral agreements, will help mitigate antitrust risk.  However, because the analysis is highly fact-specific, parties should utilize the four-step evaluation process set forth in Statement 3 of the Policy Statements before engaging in this type of joint conduct.

* * *

For additional information about the issues discussed above, or if you have any other antitrust concerns, please contact the Epstein Becker Green attorney who regularly handles your legal matters, or one of the authors of this Antitrust Byte:

E. John Steren
Member of the Firm
esteren@ebglaw.com

Patricia Wagner
Member of the Firm,
Chief Privacy Officer
pwagner@ebglaw.com

Services

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.