George B. Breen, Chair of the firm's National Health Care and Life Sciences Practice Steering Committee, will co-present "The Government’s Focus on Individual Accountability: Has it Been a Game Changer or Is It Just Business as Usual?" at the American Health Lawyers Association (AHLA) Annual Meeting, with Robert DeConti, Assistant Inspector General for Legal Affairs - Office of Counsel to the Inspector General (OCIG), and Jeffrey W. Dickstein of Phillips & Cohen.

Mr. Breen will present at the following times:

  • Tuesday, June 27, 11:00am - 12:15pm
  • Wednesday, June 28, 8:00am - 9:15am

Reports suggest that there has never been a greater enforcement effort made to hold individuals accountable for alleged corporate wrongdoing. Late last year, the Department of Justice issued new guidance - known as the "Yates Memo"- which provides 6 specific criteria designed to guide prospective enforcement in this area. One year later, we have seen FCA settlements with a former hospital CEO, a nursing home CFO and even a member of the Board of Directors of a health care organization.

The Office of Inspector General has made plain its intent to place more emphasis - and resources - towards the pursuit of individuals for exclusion and violation of the CMP laws. One year ago it created a new Affirmative Litigation Team to pursue such cases; earlier this year, OIG released revised guidance describing how it will use its permissive exclusion authority.

Have these enforcement efforts changed the landscape for healthcare entities? In this session, featuring Government, Defense and Relator counsel, we will consider such questions as:

  • How should corporate entities now respond to investigations in light of the government's focus on individuals - including company executives and board members?
  • With more resources devoted to exclusion and CMP enforcement efforts, are individual employees now more at risk than ever?
  • How has this enforcement effort impacted relators? Should more qui tam cases naming individuals be expected?
  • How - and when - does this effort impact a company's defense? Has it already impacted corporate resolutions?
  • Are there now different compliance obligations which arise from a focus on individuals? How is the corporate compliance program impacted here?

For more information, please visit

Event Detail

San Francisco, CA
Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.