A recent Wage and Hour Defense Blog post titled “Supreme Court Prevents Successive Class Actions from Reviving Time-Barred Claims,” authored by Paul DeCamp, Member of the Firm, was cited in “New Supreme Court Class Action Ruling a Boon for Employers,” on the Wage & Hour – Developments & Highlights blog.

Following is an excerpt:

The legal world is abuzz with the ripples created by a recent US Supreme Court decision on the statute of limitations in class actions. A recent post in the Epstein Becker Wage & Hour Defense Blog makes some interesting observations on the case and the issue of its application to wage-hour/overtime class actions. The case is entitled China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh and issued from the US Supreme Court a few days ago. …

This case followed the holding in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah, where the Court held that a timely-filed complaint seeking relief for a class stayed the running of the statute of limitations for other class members and that if class certification was denied, other people could enter the case without their own statute of limitations being eroded away. As the post notes, the Court subsequently ruled that this tolling principle also applied when individual members of the class later filed their own individual actions. That left the question of whether the tolling rules enunciated in these cases applied to future class actions. …

The China Agritech, holding gives employers a new and powerful weapon to defeat class actions. The American Pipe doctrine of allowing tolling for future plaintiffs in FLSA class is not viable anymore although courts will probably permit individual lawsuits seeking recovery for weeks which would have been barred under the American Pipe rationale. It is possible that subsequent class actions will be allowed if filed by people who were in a putative class that did not receive certification but there will be no tolling. As the Epstein post notes, and with which I totally agree, employers should look, first, when defending a FLSA class action, if there is a statute of limitations defense. That would get rid of the entire case!

Services

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.