Frank C. Morris, Jr., a Member of the Firm in the Litigation and Employee Benefits practices, in the firm’s Washington, DC, office, authored an article in Law360, titled “EEOC Wellness Regs Ironically Join the Walking Dead.” (Read the full version – subscription required.)

Following is an excerpt:

The real problem posed as a result of the court’s decision in the AARP case is a new threat of private litigation challenging the “voluntariness” of employer wellness programs with 30 percent or similar incentives, especially if the incentives are in the form of penalties. Plaintiffs may try to argue that, as the court found no proper basis for 30 percent incentives being deemed “voluntary,” and with the wellness regulations being remanded, new claims may be pursued, even while the EEOC contemplates its next move. Any such claims may well be pursued as putative class actions, although individual decisions and circumstances affecting each employee’s choice would present strong arguments against the commonality and typicality of such putative class claims. In these circumstances, employers should, among other arguments, point to compliance with the tri-agency regulations and their good-faith reliance on the EEOC’s wellness regulations, which were not vacated.

It would be hoped that, even if a court were to uphold a challenge to a wellness incentive program, it would do so only on a prospective basis with injunctive relief but without damages, given employers’ good-faith and detrimental reliance on the EEOC’s wellness regulations. Employers should also consider potentially presenting the issue to Congress for a legislative resolution. Clearly, further developments should be closely monitored as 2018 and other future year plan design decisions are being considered and options and risk assessments are being made by employers and program vendors and their counsel.

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.