Download a PDF of this piece

The Supreme Court of Delaware has upheld provisions in corporate certificates of incorporation requiring that lawsuits instituted under the federal Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) be brought exclusively in federal court. Salzberg v. Sciabacucchi (Del. March 18, 2020). The decision is significant because Securities Act claims can be brought in either state or federal court. Now, Delaware companies can ensure in their operating documents that any Securities Act claims be decided exclusively in federal court.

The Securities Act obligates companies issuing securities to make a “full and fair disclosure of information” relevant to a public offering. The act expressly grants securities’ purchasers a private right of action to enforce various registration and disclosure requirements. In recent years, plaintiffs have opted to file more of their Securities Act claims in state court rather than federal court after legislation made it more onerous to pursue claims in federal court. In response, some Delaware corporations adopted federal forum provisions (“FFPs”) in their charters or certificates of incorporation. These provisions often state that “the federal district courts of the United States of America shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act of 1933.”

In Salzberg, Delaware’s Supreme Court held that the FFPs were facially valid under Section 102 of Delaware’s General Corporation law (“DGCL”), which governs matters that may be included in a corporation’s certificate of corporation. Specifically, DGCL § 102(b) permits provisions relating to (1) a corporation’s management of its business and the conduct of its affairs, and (2) the powers of the corporation as well as its directors and stockholders. The court found that FFPs facilitate business management because they ensure efficient consolidation and coordination of multiple lawsuits. The court also found that FFPs regulate shareholder power by prescribing where shareholders can bring Securities Act claims.

* * * *

For more information about this Client Alert, please contact:

Daniel D. Edelman
New York
212-351- 4650
dedelman@ebglaw.com

David E. Weiss
New York
212-351-3740
dweiss@ebglaw.com

Industries

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.