Posts tagged employment litigation.
Blogs
3 minute read
In employment litigation, plaintiffs often rely on the “cat’s paw” doctrine to hold their employers liable for discriminatory or retaliatory animus of a supervisory employee who influenced, but did not make, the ultimate employment decision. On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc., greatly extended the reach of the “cat’s paw,” holding that the doctrine could be applied to hold an employer liable for an adverse employment decision that was influenced by the discriminatory or ...
Back to Health Law Advisor Blog
Recent Updates
- FTC Reverses Course on Health App Privacy
- The Battle Continues: No Appointments Clause Problem, BUT Eleventh Circuit Directs District Court to Consider Whether False Claims Act Qui Tam Provisions Violate Take Care, Vesting Clauses
- Bill Gates Gazes into the AI Crystal Ball: What are the Implications on the Healthcare and Life Sciences Industry
- 250+ Health Care Entities Targeted by HHS, DOJ Over Gender-Affirming Care for Minors
- Exclusion Authority (It’s Not Just the HHS-OIG Anymore …)