1. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a whistleblower award of more than $17 million. It is the second-largest award in the history of the agency’s whistleblower program. Awards range from 10% to 30% of monetary sanctions that exceed $1 million. This award marks the end of a one-month period—from May 13 through June 9—in which five whistleblowers received more than $26 million. Victoria Sloan Lin, from Epstein Becker Green, goes into further detail.

    This is an extended interview segment from Employment Law This Week (Episode 31: Week of June 20, 2016), an online series by Epstein Becker Green - http://bit.ly/1ZWOkeP

    Visit EmploymentLawThisWeek.com.

    These materials have been provided for informational purposes only and are not intended and should not be construed to constitute legal advice. The content of these materials is copyrighted to Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.

    # vimeo.com/171603287 Uploaded 7 Views 0 Comments
  2. Welcome to Employment Law This Week! Subscribe to our channel for new episodes every Monday!

    This week's stories include . . .

    (1) SEC Awards $17 Million to Whistleblower - http://bit.ly/1Unz9tD
    Our top story: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issues a whistleblower award of more than $17 million. The SEC has issued the second-largest award in the history of the agency’s whistleblower program. Awards range from 10% to 30% of monetary sanctions that exceed $1 million. This award marks the end of a one-month period—from May 13 through June 9—in which five whistleblowers received more than $26 million. Victoria Sloan Lin, from Epstein Becker Green, has more:

    "We’ve seen four large awards issued since May 13th of this year. However, we shouldn’t read too much into this. Each investigation is unique and proceeds along its own timeline. . . . These large awards have increased awareness of the whistleblower program and may incentivize individuals to come forward with information to the SEC. But that information still needs to lead to a successful enforcement action by the SEC. . . . However, the publicity should incentivize employers to increase their compliance efforts and thus decrease the number of large awards we see in the future."

    (2) Fifth Circuit Upholds Union Election Rules - http://bit.ly/1rtwtQA
    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upholds the “quickie” union election rules of the National Labor Relation Board (NLRB). Last year, the NLRB implemented new rules that allow for faster union elections. The rules prevent employers from challenging union campaigns until after the elections and also require them to share employee information with unions. Employer groups have filed a number of challenges, arguing that the new rules violate employers’ free speech rights and employees’ privacy rights. In this case, the Fifth Circuit disagreed.

    (3) IRS Clarifies Taxability of Wellness Program Rewards - http://bit.ly/1Qc0lg4
    Cash rewards for wellness programs are taxable. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has released a Chief Counsel Advice memorandum addressing rewards for wellness programs. The memorandum states that, other than actual medical care, any award issued by a medical program is taxable. This would include the reimbursement of an employee’s gym membership. However, the memorandum clarifies that a product or service with minimal value (like a t-shirt) can be classified as a “de minimis” fringe benefit, which would not taxable.

    (4) NLRB Scraps Rule on Mixed-Guard Unit Recognition - http://bit.ly/1sJT5hb
    The NLRB reverses its mixed-guard unit recognition rule. If a union represents both security guards and other employee groups, then an employer’s decision to recognize the union is voluntary. Before this decision, employers could also withdraw their recognition if no collective bargaining agreement was reached. Now, employers must continue to recognize the union unless and until the employees vote to decertify it in an NLRB election.

    For more on new barriers to decertifying unions, click here: http://bit.ly/1UdsSOZ

    (5) In-House Tip of the Week - http://bit.ly/1UT2ewY
    Sara Marzitelli, People Manager at Sweaty Betty USA, shares her advice on using social media in recruitment practices:

    "Employers who wish to use social media in their pre-hire recruitment should always make sure that they designate a search person who is not the decision-maker in the hiring process. . . The search person should always make sure that they’re doing the social media searches at the same point in the hiring process each time. For example, if the search is always done before the candidate is interviewed, they should make sure they do that with every applicant. . . The designated search person should make sure that they’re not conveying any protected characteristics or activities to the hiring manager in the process. This will protect the employer from the applicant making claims that they used a protected characteristic or activity for a basis for not hiring the applicant. . . As with all hiring decisions, employers should make sure that they have a legitimate basis for not hiring an employee."

    Visit EmploymentLawThisWeek.com.

    These materials have been provided for informational purposes only and are not intended and should not be construed to constitute legal advice. The content of these materials is copyrighted to Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.

    # vimeo.com/171131067 Uploaded 15 Views 0 Comments
  3. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the clock for constructive discharge claims starts with resignation, resolving a circuit split on the issue. An employee for the U.S. Postal Service filed an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charge alleging constructive discharge 41 days after he submitted his resignation but 96 days after the last allegedly discriminatory act. A federal civil servant must contact the EEOC within 45 days of the “matter alleged to be discriminatory.” The lower court dismissed the employee’s claim, but the Supreme Court reversed this decision, ruling that the clock for constructive discharge claims begins when an employee gives notice of resignation, not after the employer's last act of bias. Lauren Malanga Casey, from Epstein Becker Green, has more.

    Visit EmploymentLawThisWeek.com.

    These materials have been provided for informational purposes only and are not intended and should not be construed to constitute legal advice. The content of these materials is copyrighted to Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.

    # vimeo.com/170825912 Uploaded 15 Views 0 Comments
  4. Here’s your chance to weigh in on new national origin discrimination guidance. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is soliciting public comments until July 1 on its proposed new guidance. Approximately 11% of private-sector EEOC charges filed in fiscal year 2015 were national origin discrimination claims. The new guidance addresses issues like human trafficking, accent discrimination, and job segregation. Richard Palmer, from Epstein Becker Green, goes into further detail:

    "The new guidelines are similar in scope to the guidelines issued back in 2002. However, some areas have been expanded, and there are some new areas altogether. . . . One area where an employer may want to provide public comment relates to customer preference. As written, it is unlawful for an employer to base an adverse employment decision on the preference of a customer to deal with someone without an accent. . . . In addition, the proposed guidance contains a new section called ‘Promising Practices.’ I encourage employers to review these practices and comment if you believe that these practices are overreaching."

    This is an extended interview segment from Employment Law This Week (Episode 30: Week of June 13, 2016), an online series by Epstein Becker Green - http://bit.ly/1VRbCUg

    Visit EmploymentLawThisWeek.com.

    These materials have been provided for informational purposes only and are not intended and should not be construed to constitute legal advice. The content of these materials is copyrighted to Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.

    # vimeo.com/170823736 Uploaded 4 Views 0 Comments
  5. President Obama signs the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA). Under the DTSA, employers can now sue in federal court for trade secret misappropriation. Though there is some overlap with the Uniform Trade Secrets Act — adopted in some version by 48 states — the DTSA marks a notable change in how these cases are litigated, creating a federal civil cause of action. The new law contains broad whistleblower protections and new requirements for employers to give notice of these protections. David Clark, from Epstein Becker Green, has more on how the DTSA will impact state laws.

    For more on this story, click here: http://bit.ly/27HQg0b

    Visit EmploymentLawThisWeek.com.

    These materials have been provided for informational purposes only and are not intended and should not be construed to constitute legal advice. The content of these materials is copyrighted to Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.

    # vimeo.com/170513418 Uploaded 3 Views 0 Comments

Employment Law This Week®

Epstein Becker Green

Employment Law This Week® tracks the top developments in employment and labor law and workforce management in a matter of minutes every #WorkforceWednesday. Presented by law firm Epstein Becker Green. Learn more at http://www.ebglaw.com/employment-law-this-week/

Browse This Channel

Channels are a simple, beautiful way to showcase and watch videos. Browse more Channels.