Stuart Gerson Provides Commentary in “Supreme Court Considers Whether Free Retiree Benefits Continue”Society for Human Resource Management November 12, 2014
Stuart M. Gerson, Member of the Firm in the Litigation and Health Care & Life Sciences practices, in the firm's Washington, DC, and New York offices, provided commentary on M&G Polymers USA v. Hobert Freel Tackett in “Supreme Court Considers Whether Free Retiree Benefits Continue,” by Allen Smith. (Read the full article - subscription required.)
Following is an excerpt:
The 3rd and 5th Circuits have exactly the opposite presumption as Yard-Man. So, in those circuits, if the contract is silent, retiree health benefits are presumed to expire, noted Stuart Gerson, an attorney with Epstein Becker & Green in Washington, D.C. He expected Yard-Man to fall and extrinsic evidence allowed in to interpret contracts.