Peter Steinmeyer ,a Member of the Firm in the Labor and Employment practice and the Managing Shareholder of the firm's Chicago office, was quoted in an article titled "Top 5 Rulings That Shaped Noncompete Law in 2013." (Read the full version — subscription required.)

Following is an excerpt:

An Illinois appeals court decision on what constitutes a valid noncompete and a U.S. Supreme Court ruling voicing full-throated support for enforcing forum selection clauses top the list of 2013's most significant developments for lawyers who deal with restrictive covenants. ?...

Epstein Becker Green's Peter Steinmeyer said he saw the Fifield matter as the most significant noncompete case of 2013.

"The state Supreme Court declined to take the case and that's presumably because they thought it was correct, or because the Supreme Court is waiting for a circuit split within the state to develop," Steinmeyer said. "In the meantime, employers and lawyers who advise them are left with tremendous uncertainty in Illinois as to what is adequate consideration for a restrictive covenant."

Though the appeals court appeared to set a bright-line rule that two years of continued employment is needed to constitute the adequate consideration that will render a noncompete enforceable, employers in Illinois now have to grapple with lingering questions about what other perks — like a promotion, stock options or a cash bonus — will be deemed adequate to back up such an agreement, according to Steinmeyer.

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.