Jeffrey Landes and Susan Gross Sholinsky, both Members of the Firm in the Labor and Employment practice, in the New York office, were quoted in an article titled "Retailers Facing Employment Law Vulnerabilities."

Following is an excerpt:

Increased government regulatory activity has been on the minds of most employers for the past several years, and U.S. retailers are no exception. At a roundtable event tailored exclusively to their retail clients, lawyers from Epstein Becker Green discussed some of the key legal risks members of the industry are facing.

In an interview, Jeffrey Landes and Susan Gross Sholinsky, partners in the firm's labor and employment practice, told CorpCounsel.com that certain features peculiar to the retail industry give rise to increased vulnerabilities on some fronts.

For instance, says Landes, the luxury retail world in particular can place demands on employees around the clock. When non-exempt employees communicate with clients via smartphones 24/7, he says, that can present problems from a wage-and-hour standpoint. ...

The lawyers don't recommend creating unpaid internships, but if retailers opt to do so, Landes says there should be multiple programs, run by different managers, within any organization. "It's really all about observing and shadowing the designers," he says. "It's not about doing things that are going to benefit the company. It's got to be an educational experience." ...

In New York, where the lawyers are based, state law goes beyond that of many jurisdictions if offering worker protections. The state requires employers to take into consideration factors such as how long ago the crime occurred, how old the employee was at the time, how related the crime is to the type of work, and how well the person has rehabilitated themselves. Sholinsky says, "We recommend that employers use the balancing test that's propounded by New York State law, even though it's not legally required." ...

The compiled information documents allegations, not convictions, and Sholinsky warns that the data isn't as reliable as conviction information. "This is more like a list of arrests as opposed to convictions," she says. "The EEOC in particular has come out and said it's not fair to use arrest information in hiring."

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.